The new provision, snuck into a last-minute amendment to the budget, was signed by Gov. Mike DeWine.
(Photo courtesy of AP)
In the latest state-level swing at LGBTQ health care access, Ohio will now allow medical providers to refuse to administer any medical treatment that violates their moral, ethical, or religious beliefs.
The language was buried in a 700-page document of last-minute amendments to the state’s two-year budget bill, which Ohio Gov. Mike DeWine approved last Thursday. The provision allows anyone providing medical care — from doctors and nurses to researchers and lab techs – and anyone paying for that care (namely, insurance providers), “the freedom to decline to perform, participate in, or pay for any health care service which violates the practitioner’s, institution’s, or payer’s conscience as informed by the moral, ethical, or religious beliefs.”
The bill does not allow medical professionals to deny LGBTQ people care, carte blanche; the exemption “is limited to conscience-based objections to a particular health care service.” It goes on to say that the provider is “responsible for providing all appropriate health care services, other than the particular health care service that conflicts with the medical practitioner’s beliefs or convictions, until another medical practitioner or facility is available.”
#YouTookAnOathtoServeAllPatients
What's this? Using last minute, hidden language in a bill to take a group of citizens' rights away? A trend becoming all to routine in today's legislatures. As for these moral grounds, I have a question for Ohio's leguslature: If a health care provider refuses to help an LGBTQ+ person, and soon afterward they suffer a severe medical episode or even death, can that provider be held liable for that person's suffering or possibly preventable demise?