Aren’t stop and identify laws, one of the more basic laws? How can a police officer not now that?

Theres is legal precedent the a police officer can not use ignorance of the law as an excuse to “arrest” some one.

Here’s the post on it:

www.reyets.com

The Michigan Supreme Court says that a police officer cannot benefit from his own ignorance of the law to the detriment of a defendant.

This is another way of how police get away with being brutal!

”The judges ruled that the deputies are at least partially immune from being sued because they were operating under a good-faith belief that the statute gave them the right to demand identification.”